From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Gaurav Priyolkar <gaurav_lists(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: "Relation x does not exist" error when x does exist |
Date: | 2001-10-12 18:12:16 |
Message-ID: | 27705.1002910336@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Gaurav Priyolkar <gaurav_lists(at)yahoo(dot)com> writes:
> So as you can see, I get a "relation does not exist" error on a
> function that is very much there.=20
It's not there at the point of the failure, though. Your observation
that foo_1 is still there is made after rolling back the drop and
recreate of foo_1.
The reason there's an issue is that plpgsql caches a query plan for the
"SELECT x FROM foo_1" query, and that plan is no good after you drop the
original version of foo_1; but we don't currently have a mechanism to
invalidate the cached plan.
Workarounds: (1) use EXECUTE to avoid caching a plan for the problem
queries; (2) instead of DROP/CREATE, consider DELETE FROM/INSERT INTO
(or perhaps TRUNCATE instead of DELETE, although TRUNCATE can't be
rolled back).
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stephan Szabo | 2001-10-12 18:13:19 | Re: Another episode of the regular MySql-PostgreSQL war |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-10-12 18:11:33 | Re: Joining Between Databases |