From: | Adrien Nayrat <adrien(dot)nayrat(at)anayrat(dot)info> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
Cc: | David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: New GUC to sample log queries |
Date: | 2018-06-24 11:22:55 |
Message-ID: | 276e308f-8bd5-1d14-094f-0d295b414a31@anayrat.info |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 05/31/2018 03:22 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 02:37:07PM +0200, Adrien Nayrat wrote:
>> On 05/31/2018 03:34 AM, David Rowley wrote:
>>> On 31 May 2018 at 06:44, Adrien Nayrat <adrien(dot)nayrat(at)anayrat(dot)info> wrote:
>>>> Here is a naive SELECT only bench with a dataset which fit in ram (scale factor
>>>> = 100) and PGDATA and log on a ramdisk:
>>>> shared_buffers = 4GB
>>>> seq_page_cost = random_page_cost = 1.0
>>>> logging_collector = on (no rotation)
>>>
>>> It would be better to just: SELECT 1; to try to get the true overhead
>>> of the additional logging code.
>>
>> Right, I wonder why I didn't have the idea :)
>
> Using prepared statements help also in reducing the load with
> unnecessary planning.
> --
> Michael
>
Thanks, but the winner is Julien Rouhaud with only ";", I reach 115K TPS on my
laptop :)
Attached third version of the patch with documentation.
--
Adrien NAYRAT
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
sample_rate-3.patch | text/x-patch | 4.4 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2018-06-24 11:27:14 | Re: Invisible Indexes |
Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2018-06-24 11:07:44 | Re: Desirability of client-side expressions in psql? |