From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Brendan Hill" <brendanh(at)jims(dot)net> |
Cc: | "'Craig Ringer'" <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Idle processes chewing up CPU? |
Date: | 2009-09-29 01:30:40 |
Message-ID: | 27692.1254187840@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
"Brendan Hill" <brendanh(at)jims(dot)net> writes:
> Bit of a catch 22 - since it happens rarely, there's no definitive
> confirmation that it's fixed the problem.
> Also, not sure if I'm comfortable applying the change and recompiling
> myself, wouldn't have a clue where to start.
Uh, so you haven't actually tested it at all?
> I can't see how the change would hurt though, seems like a good idea
> regardless, what do you think?
I'm not really inclined to throw it in there just on speculation
that it *might* mask a bug that's really somewhere else.
I can't help you with producing a recompiled executable for Windows,
but there are other people around the list who can.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Oleg Bartunov | 2009-09-29 04:33:50 | Re: generic modelling of data models; enforcing constraints dynamically... |
Previous Message | Martin Gainty | 2009-09-29 00:33:45 | Re: bulk inserts |