| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au> |
| Cc: | Pavel(dot)Janik(at)linux(dot)cz, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Re: pg_dump and LOs (another proposal) |
| Date: | 2000-07-06 06:32:56 |
| Message-ID: | 27677.962865176@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> At 13:06 5/07/00 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> UPDATE userTable SET oidcolumn = tmptable.newLOoid WHERE
>> oidcolumn = tmptable.oldLOoid;
> It's actually nastier than this since there could be multiple oid columns,
> implying, potentially, multiple scans of the table.
So?
> I suppose
> update userTable set
> oidCol1 = Coalesce( (Select newLOoid from oidxref where oldLOoid = oidCol1
> ), oidCol1 ),
> oidCol2 = Coalesce( (Select newLOoid from oidxref where oldLOoid = oidCol2
> ), oidCol2 ),
> ...
> would work, or at least only update each row once, but it looks slow.
Almost certainly slower than processing each column in a separate
UPDATE. It does not pay to try to be smarter than the planner is ;-)
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Hannu Krosing | 2000-07-06 06:36:47 | Re: Proposed new libpq API |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2000-07-06 06:26:11 | Re: Array type confusion |