Re: [BUGS] Re: BUG #5065: pg_ctl start fails as administrator, with "could not locate matching postgres executable"

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Jesse Morris <jmorris(at)coverity(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [BUGS] Re: BUG #5065: pg_ctl start fails as administrator, with "could not locate matching postgres executable"
Date: 2009-10-21 14:29:53
Message-ID: 27638.1256135393@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> From a quick look, it looks fine to me. I don't have time to do a
>> complete check right now, but I'll do that as soon as I can and then
>> commit it - unless people feel it's more urgent than maybe a week
>> worst case, in which case someone else has to pick it up :-)

> Are we going to do an 8.4.2 release soon?

There's been no discussion of one, so it's not happening in less than
a week. I'm happy to wait for Magnus on this --- an extra set of
eyeballs can't hurt, especially on something that (I assume) we're
going to back-patch.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2009-10-21 14:34:39 Re: Re: BUG #5065: pg_ctl start fails as administrator, with "could not locate matching postgres executable"
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2009-10-21 14:10:20 Re: [BUGS] Re: BUG #5065: pg_ctl start fails as administrator, with "could not locate matching postgres executable"

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2009-10-21 14:34:39 Re: Re: BUG #5065: pg_ctl start fails as administrator, with "could not locate matching postgres executable"
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-10-21 14:27:44 Re: Could regexp_matches be immutable?