Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On 3/13/18 13:45, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Yeah. I'd written that off as too low-probability to worry about,
>> but maybe not. I'll poke further. Peter, which lcov did you test?
> lcov: LCOV version 1.13
> The one that comes with Debian stable, presumably the same that is
> running on coverage.p.o.
OK, now we're getting into the *really* low-probability cases. Like,
maybe it's time to remove and reinstall lcov and/or gcc on that box?
regards, tom lane