| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Masao Fujii <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Showing parallel status in \df+ |
| Date: | 2016-07-12 04:26:08 |
| Message-ID: | 27612.1468297568@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 11:36 AM, Alvaro Herrera
> <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> So prosrc for internal/C and NULL for others? WFM.
> And so we'd remove "Language" at the same time? That does not sound bad to me.
Hm, I wasn't thinking of that step. The main knock on "Source code" is
that it is usually too large to fit into the display grid --- but that
argument doesn't work against "Language". Also, while "Language" is
certainly an implementation detail in some sense, it is a pretty useful
detail: it gives you a good hint about the likely speed of the function,
for instance.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andreas Seltenreich | 2016-07-12 07:20:17 | Re: GiST index build versus NaN coordinates |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2016-07-12 03:28:34 | Re: Showing parallel status in \df+ |