Re: Set-returning functions only allowed if written in language 'sql'

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: raf <raf(at)raf(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Set-returning functions only allowed if written in language 'sql'
Date: 2009-02-11 00:49:37
Message-ID: 27612.1234313377@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

raf <raf(at)raf(dot)org> writes:
> does this mean that "select srf()" is no longer deprecated?

Well, it's got various issues --- in particular it's not real clear what
should happen if there's more than one SRF in a select list. It's
unlikely to go away though, especially not before we have an adequate
replacement.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jason 2009-02-12 00:48:25 BUG #4646: Default password is patently absurd
Previous Message raf 2009-02-10 23:48:16 Re: Set-returning functions only allowed if written in language 'sql'