Re: pg_upgrade diffs on WIndows

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade diffs on WIndows
Date: 2012-09-05 19:36:26
Message-ID: 27595.1346873786@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> OK, I now have a complete handle on what's going on here, and withdraw
> my earlier statement that I am confused on this issue :-)

> First, one lot of CRs is produced because the pg_upgrade test script
> calls pg_dumpall without -f and redirects that to a file, which Windows
> kindly opens on text mode. The solution to that is to change the test
> script to use pg_dumpall -f instead.

> The second lot of CRs (seen in the second dump file in the diff i
> previously sent) is produced by pg_upgrade writing its output in text
> mode, which turns LF into CRLF. The solution to that is the patch to
> dump.c I posted, which, as Bruce observed, does the same thing that
> pg_dumpall does. Arguably, it should also open the input file in binary,
> so that if there really is a CRLF in the dump it won't be eaten.

+1 to all the above. Do we want to risk squeezing this into 9.2.0,
or is it better to delay?

> Another question is whether or not pg_dumpall (and pg_dump in text mode
> too for that matter) should be trying to suppress newline translation on
> its output even to stdout.

I'm inclined to think not - we've not heard any complaints from Windows
users about its current behavior, and it's been like that forever.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2012-09-05 19:40:25 Re: pg_upgrade diffs on WIndows
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2012-09-05 19:17:40 Re: pg_upgrade diffs on WIndows