| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz>, Postgresql General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: Server locale? |
| Date: | 2002-10-10 14:06:58 |
| Message-ID: | 27575.1034258818@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> writes:
>> Added to TODO:
>>
>> o Allow SHOW of non-modifiable variables, like pg_controldata
> Ok, I'm looking at guc.c right now and is there any reason why you couldn't
> just add a PGC_READONLY that throws an error when you try to change it. If
> this is the case I'd be willing to give it a shot.
I was thinking of adding a GUC_READONLY bit to the config struct's flags
word, instead. A PGC_ value that doesn't correspond to any possible
SetConfig context seems a little off key, somehow. But it might be
worth adding a PGC_INITDB value to GucContext also ... otherwise there's
no good value to put in the context field for these variables.
Possibly Peter will have a different thought about how it should be
done.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joe Conway | 2002-10-10 14:18:16 | Re: user name lost from dictionary |
| Previous Message | Adam Witney | 2002-10-10 13:49:26 | Re: pg_restore error |