Re: Overhauling GUCS

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
Cc: Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Overhauling GUCS
Date: 2008-06-04 18:22:38
Message-ID: 27574.1212603758@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"David E. Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> writes:
> Exactly. The issue is that application developers, who are not DBAs,
> have no idea how to tune PostgreSQL, and postgresql.conf is daunting
> and confusing. So they use a different database that's "faster".

I take it you haven't looked at mysql's configuration file lately.

They aren't actually in any better shape than we are, except that
they supply several "preconfigured" sample files for people to choose
from.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-06-04 18:23:38 Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL
Previous Message Jeffrey Baker 2008-06-04 17:58:23 meaning of backend exit code 2?