Re: Slow query performance on large table

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andreas Pflug <Andreas(dot)Pflug(at)web(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Slow query performance on large table
Date: 2003-03-04 17:53:13
Message-ID: 27569.1046800393@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Andreas Pflug <Andreas(dot)Pflug(at)web(dot)de> writes:
> "create index ind_meas on measurement (assessment,time)" should perform
> the same as "... primary key(assessment,time)".

Sure.

> Do possibly non-optimal indices (only assessment, only time as Paul
> described earlier) screw up the optimizer, igoring the better option
> usiing the PK?

One would like to think the optimizer will make the right choice. But
using a two-column index just because it's there isn't necessarily the
right choice. The two-column index will certainly be bulkier and more
expensive to scan, so if there's a one-column index that's nearly as
selective, it might be a better choice.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andreas Pflug 2003-03-04 21:45:36 Re: Slow query performance on large table
Previous Message Tomasz Myrta 2003-03-04 17:29:30 Re: Slow query performance on large table