From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
Cc: | "Nigel J(dot) Andrews" <nandrews(at)investsystems(dot)co(dot)uk>, "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: RC1? |
Date: | 2002-11-14 05:17:40 |
Message-ID: | 27536.1037251060@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-ports |
"Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
>> How shall we distinguish your version of freebsd from the ones that
>> need the other comparison file?
> He is using the FreeBSD 3.x series (which is quite old now), whereas most
> people are probably using 4.x. I have no problems with regression tests on
> 4.x so perhaps it's something that changed??
How do you feel about resultmap entries
float8/i.86-.*-freebsd3=float8-fp-exception
float8/i.86-.*-freebsd4=float8-small-is-zero
to replace the existing
float8/i.86-.*-freebsd=float8-small-is-zero
Are there (now or in the foreseeable future) freebsd major versions > 4?
We could do
float8/i.86-.*-freebsd[4-9]=float8-small-is-zero
which might or might not be more future-proof.
> Actually, I've only tested FreeBSD/alpha 4.x - perhaps I should test intel
> as well.
<blink> ain't none of the float8 bsd resultmap entries will match alpha...
so you must be matching the default version?
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Neil Conway | 2002-11-14 05:24:06 | Re: An article mentioning PostgreSQL |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-11-14 05:04:43 | Re: An article mentioning PostgreSQL |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Neil Conway | 2002-11-14 05:43:32 | Re: RC1? |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-11-14 05:02:43 | Re: RC1? |