Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Improved parallel make support

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Improved parallel make support
Date: 2010-11-13 17:20:59
Message-ID: 27533.1289668859@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> On lr, 2010-11-13 at 11:12 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> It looks like all the unhappy critters are getting the same "virtual
>> memory exhausted" error. I wonder whether they are all using make
>> 3.80 ...

> It turns out that there is an unrelated bug in 3.80 that some Linux
> distributions have patched around. 3.81 or 3.82 are OK.

So what do you mean by "unrelated bug"? Can we work around it?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Erik Rijkers 2010-11-13 17:52:58 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Improved parallel make support
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2010-11-13 17:18:08 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Improved parallel make support

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2010-11-13 17:30:03 Re: WIP: extensible enums
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2010-11-13 17:18:08 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Improved parallel make support