| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: plperl needs upgrade for Fedora 10 |
| Date: | 2008-11-06 16:29:58 |
| Message-ID: | 27526.1225988998@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> Tom Lane escribi:
>> BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) glibc-devel bison flex autoconf gawk
>> BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::Embed), perl-devel
> Huh, but the requirement for ExtUtils::Embed is at runtime, so shouldn't
> it be a plain Requires instead of BuildRequires?
Really? I'm pretty sure I recall the RPM build failing when they
changed that. (But it's possible that the regression test step is what
failed, I don't remember.) I'd think I'd have heard about it if there
were a missing runtime dependency.
BTW, Andrew was wondering *why* Fedora isn't bundling these anymore.
The CVS logs mention something about versioned perl, so it's possible
that they had to split out some modules to support multiple Perl
installations cleanly.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2008-11-06 16:33:00 | Re: plperl needs upgrade for Fedora 10 |
| Previous Message | Ron Mayer | 2008-11-06 16:26:31 | Re: Patch for ISO-8601-Interval Input and output. |