| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Jaime Casanova <systemguards(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Maintaining cluster order on insert |
| Date: | 2007-05-18 15:08:26 |
| Message-ID: | 27526.1179500906@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> The beef of the patch is two new optional indexam API functions:
> amprepareinsert and amfinishinsert. amprepareinsert is called before
> inserting the heap tuple. It descends the tree and finds and pins the
> right leaf page to insert to, and returns a suggestion on where the heap
> tuple should be inserted. amfinishinsert is called after inserting the
> heap tuple to actually insert the index tuple. Documentation for these
> functions need to be added indexam.sgml, I noticed that that's not done yet.
What happens when there's more than one index?
Is there a risk of deadlock during concurrent insertions (from different
processes trying to lock the same buffers in different orders)?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2007-05-18 15:19:18 | Re: Maintaining cluster order on insert |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-05-18 14:45:01 | Re: CREATE TABLE LIKE INCLUDING INDEXES support |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2007-05-18 15:19:18 | Re: Maintaining cluster order on insert |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-05-18 14:45:01 | Re: CREATE TABLE LIKE INCLUDING INDEXES support |