From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Seneca Cunningham <scunning(at)ca(dot)afilias(dot)info> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? |
Date: | 2005-12-02 04:03:52 |
Message-ID: | 27504.1133496232@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches pgsql-ports |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> I trimmed it down to:
> --with-prefer-libedit prefer libedit over readline
OK, I can live with that.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-12-02 04:34:00 | Re: Numeric 508 datatype |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-12-02 03:58:10 | Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-12-02 04:06:50 | Re: BUG #2056: to_char no long takes time as input? |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-12-02 04:02:38 | Re: BUG #2056: to_char no long takes time as input? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2005-12-02 08:28:19 | Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-12-02 03:58:10 | Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? |