Re: Recent 027_streaming_regress.pl hangs

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Recent 027_streaming_regress.pl hangs
Date: 2024-03-26 04:00:38
Message-ID: 2750204.1711425638@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> I think there must be some actual regression involved. The frequency of
> failures on HEAD vs failures on 16 - both of which run the tests concurrently
> via meson - is just vastly different.

Are you sure it's not just that the total time to run the core
regression tests has grown to a bit more than what the test timeout
allows for?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2024-03-26 04:06:09 Re: speed up a logical replica setup
Previous Message shveta malik 2024-03-26 04:00:32 Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation