Re: SR slaves and .pgpass

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SR slaves and .pgpass
Date: 2010-06-08 04:13:07
Message-ID: 27471.1275970387@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Hmm.. is it worth going back to my proposal?

I don't recall exactly what proposal you might be referring to, but
I'm hesitant to put any large amount of work into hacking .pgpass
processing for this. The whole business of replication authorization
is likely to get revisited in 9.1, no? I think a cheap-and-cheerful
solution is about right for the moment.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gnanakumar 2010-06-08 05:29:09 Re: PITR Recovery Question
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2010-06-08 03:58:26 Re: SR slaves and .pgpass