| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Gurjeet Singh <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: minimal update |
| Date: | 2008-10-22 22:05:26 |
| Message-ID: | 27462.1224713126@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
>> On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 3:24 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> "Minimal" really fails to convey the point here IMHO. How about
>>> something like "suppress_no_op_updates_trigger"?
> I think it means something to us, but "no op" is a very technical phrase
> that probably doesn't travel very well.
Agreed --- I was hoping someone could improve on that part. The only
other words I could come up with were "empty" and "useless", neither of
which seem quite le mot juste ...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kenneth Marshall | 2008-10-22 22:10:55 | Re: minimal update |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2008-10-22 21:56:37 | Re: minimal update |