| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: use new List API names |
| Date: | 2004-05-30 21:31:55 |
| Message-ID: | 27456.1085952715@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> I thought llast() and length() were going away too?
> For llast(), I decided to keep it around: it is nicely symmetric
> with linitial(), and it makes any code that actually needs the last
> value in a list significantly more readable. Since it's a macro
> there's no runtime cost.
> I had thought about keeping length() around, but on second thought I
> don't see why we ought to. I'll replace it with list_length() and
> post an updated patch.
Okay, that works for me.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Oliver Elphick | 2004-05-30 21:53:12 | CVS tip problems |
| Previous Message | Neil Conway | 2004-05-30 21:09:44 | Re: use new List API names |