Re: notification: pg_notify ?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Neil Conway <nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Greg Copeland <greg(at)CopelandConsulting(dot)Net>
Subject: Re: notification: pg_notify ?
Date: 2002-03-23 23:03:38
Message-ID: 27415.1016924618@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Neil Conway <nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org> writes:
> I can see 1 potential problem: there is a race condition in the "detect
> an overrun" logic.

Only if you do it that way :-(. Take another look at the SI messaging
logic: it will *not* lose overrun notifications.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ulrich Neumann 2002-03-24 04:55:00 patch for include/utils/datetime.h to target NetWare
Previous Message Neil Conway 2002-03-23 22:46:30 Re: notification: pg_notify ?