From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | tomas(at)tuxteam(dot)de, "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: File system snapshots for multiple file systems |
Date: | 2008-04-08 16:42:27 |
Message-ID: | 2741.1207672947@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> What I was complaining/suggesting is that we should make what you did to
> actually work, because it's a lot simpler. And as Jonah pointed out,
> we'd need to inhibit checkpoints between pg_start_backup() and
> pg_stop_backup() to make it work.
I don't think that follows --- what you'd need is to prevent the
checkpoints from removing/recycling old WAL files, but you can still
allow a checkpoint to occur. Any subsequent recovery from the backup
would need to replay from the checkpoint identified by the backup label
file anyway.
Whether it's a good idea or not is a bit debatable though. I'm
concerned about the WAL partition filling up (--> PANIC), especially
if you forget to pg_stop_backup after getting your backup.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2008-04-08 16:59:56 | Re: [PATCHES] libpq type system 0.9a |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2008-04-08 16:34:13 | Re: temp tables should not have pg_shdepend entries |