Re: Proposal: Support custom authentication methods using hooks

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, samay sharma <smilingsamay(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Proposal: Support custom authentication methods using hooks
Date: 2022-02-28 21:18:48
Message-ID: 2738622.1646083128@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> writes:
> md5 should be removed.

Really? I've always thought that the arguments against it were
overblown for our use-case. At any rate, it's likely to be
years before we could practically do that, since it's the best
that older client libraries can manage.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jacob Champion 2022-02-28 21:42:54 Re: [PATCH] Expose port->authn_id to extensions and triggers
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2022-02-28 21:17:26 Re: Missed condition-variable wakeups on FreeBSD