| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Isn't HANDLE 64 bits on Win64? |
| Date: | 2010-11-16 14:45:12 |
| Message-ID: | 27353.1289918712@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> writes:
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 10:01 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 01:35, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> BTW, it seems like it'd be a good thing if we had a Win64 machine in the
>>> buildfarm.
>> Yes. I actually thought we had one. Dave, weren't you going to set one up?
> I was, but I saw one there so didn't bother (hamerkop). Windows
> buildfarm critters can take a surprising amount of herding...
hamerkop seems to have gone AWOL around the time of the git conversion.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-11-16 15:09:18 | Re: track_functions default |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-11-16 14:42:41 | Re: Isn't HANDLE 64 bits on Win64? |