Re: Is "trust" really a good default?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Is "trust" really a good default?
Date: 2004-07-12 20:07:04
Message-ID: 27325.1089662824@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> writes:
> Is it really such a good idea to have "trust" authentication enabled for
> localhost (TCP/IP and Unix sockets) by default?

No, but none of the others are better. See previous discussions in the
archives. I don't think the situation has changed any since the last
time we hashed this out.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2004-07-12 20:11:42 Re: Is "trust" really a good default?
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2004-07-12 19:41:16 Is "trust" really a good default?