Re: recent deadlock regression test failures

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: recent deadlock regression test failures
Date: 2017-04-09 00:33:13
Message-ID: 2731.1491697993@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Sat, Apr 8, 2017 at 12:56 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> I'm imagining an API like
>> isolation_test_is_waiting_for(int, int[]) returns bool

> Good suggestion.

> Thomas, would you like to produce a patch along these lines, or
> should I?

I'll be happy to review/push if someone else does a first draft.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2017-04-09 00:53:54 Re: recent deadlock regression test failures
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2017-04-09 00:32:31 Re: [pgsql-www] Small issue in online devel documentation build