From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> |
Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: branching for 9.2devel |
Date: | 2011-04-26 04:11:29 |
Message-ID: | 27285.1303791089@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> writes:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 2:07 AM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
>> Oh, it just occurred to me that maybe you thought the whole thing
>> *including* indent would be reimplemented in perl. That was never my
>> intention, and is a much larger project than I had in mind.
> Oh, I thought that was what you were proposing too.
Yeah, me too. If it still depends on a patched BSD indent then it's not
clear to me how much portability/ease-of-installation we're really
buying. I thought what was being proposed was a pure Perl script.
> I was king of shocked that people would propose that so freely since
> it seemed like a huge project to me too. But then after thinking about
> it I wonder if it wouldn't be easier than it sounds.
I thought there were enough loose parsing bits out there on CPAN that
this wasn't an unreasonable proposition.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Vaibhav Kaushal | 2011-04-26 06:34:20 | What would AggrefExprState nodes' args contain? |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2011-04-26 03:01:22 | Re: branching for 9.2devel |