Re: [HACKERS] New version number 6.6 or 7.0

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] New version number 6.6 or 7.0
Date: 1999-07-19 15:30:25
Message-ID: 27273.932398225@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> We can revisit this as the
> release gets closer, but to change it then, I am going to have to change
> PG_VERSION, and that will require initdb for everyone. Perhaps just
> before we enter beta, we can discuss it, knowing then what our features
> will be.

We usually cause enough initdb's during a development cycle that another
one doesn't seem like a big problem. Let's leave it at 6.6 for now, and
wait to see what the feature list looks like when it's time to start
beta.

regards, tom lane

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 1999-07-19 15:34:28 Re: [HACKERS] CVS
Previous Message Thomas Lockhart 1999-07-19 15:23:44 Re: [HACKERS] Why DEFAULT text 'now' does not work for TIMESTAMP columns