From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>, "Jie Zhang" <jzhang(at)greenplum(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] WIP: bitmap indexes |
Date: | 2006-08-15 01:38:36 |
Message-ID: | 27266.1155605916@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> Attached is an update to the patch implementing bitmap indexes Jie sent
> last week.
What's the current status of this patch ... has any work been done since
the first of the month?
I suppose the patch as given here no longer applies to HEAD, because of
recent changes in rmgr for Simon's restartable-recovery patch (should be
easy enough to fix) and consumption of OIDs by other patches (also easy
to fix, in principle, but doubtless tedious).
If you have to renumber OIDs I'd suggest starting at 3000 for your added
OIDs, to leave some daylight for any other patches that go in during the
next couple weeks.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Gavin Sherry | 2006-08-15 01:50:11 | Re: [PATCHES] WIP: bitmap indexes |
Previous Message | andrew | 2006-08-15 00:14:24 | Re: domains code query |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Gavin Sherry | 2006-08-15 01:50:11 | Re: [PATCHES] WIP: bitmap indexes |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2006-08-14 21:42:58 | Re: [Patch] - Fix for bug #2558, InitDB failed to run |