Re: Beta2 Wrap Up ...

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>, Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Beta2 Wrap Up ...
Date: 2005-09-19 14:57:00
Message-ID: 27260.1127141820@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> Is there a reason the old/new can't be aliaseed to each other, instead of
> the old just being removed?

Any change like that would require another initdb. If we were going to
force another initdb, my vote would be to revert these functions to
where they were in beta1. It was a mistake to change them in such a
hurry.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-09-19 15:01:33 Re: Start translating
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-09-19 14:53:44 Re: New dot releases