Re: Proposal: generate_iterator functions

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Proposal: generate_iterator functions
Date: 2007-10-18 19:20:02
Message-ID: 27251.1192735202@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On 10/18/07, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> On the question of being too long, I could live with
>> generate_subscripts().

> how about array_iota?

I think a lot of people wouldn't get the reference. How about
array_subscripts()?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joe Conway 2007-10-18 19:20:16 Re: Proposal: generate_iterator functions
Previous Message Merlin Moncure 2007-10-18 19:13:28 Re: Proposal: generate_iterator functions