From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Lee Kindness <lkindness(at)csl(dot)co(dot)uk> |
Cc: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, maves(at)csl(dot)co(dot)uk, Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: ecpg - GRANT bug |
Date: | 2001-10-12 17:18:49 |
Message-ID: | 27250.1002907129@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
Lee Kindness <lkindness(at)csl(dot)co(dot)uk> writes:
> ***************
> *** 1693,1699 ****
> GrantStmt: GRANT privileges ON opt_table relation_name_list TO grantee_list opt_with_grant
> {
> ! $$ = cat_str(8, make_str("grant"), $2, make_str("on"), $4, $5, make_str("to"), $7);
> }
> ;
> --- 1693,1699 ----
> GrantStmt: GRANT privileges ON opt_table relation_name_list TO grantee_list opt_with_grant
> {
> ! $$ = cat_str(7, make_str("grant"), $2, make_str("on"), $4, $5, make_str("to"), $7);
> }
> ;
Uh, isn't the correct fix
! $$ = cat_str(8, make_str("grant"), $2, make_str("on"), $4, $5, make_str("to"), $7, $8);
ISTM your patch loses the opt_with_grant clause. (Of course the backend
doesn't currently accept that clause anyway, but that's no reason for
ecpg to drop it.)
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-10-12 17:53:49 | Re: Possible bug in ALTER TABLE RENAME COLUMN (PostgreSQL 7.1.3) |
Previous Message | Lee Kindness | 2001-10-12 15:33:00 | ecpg - GRANT bug |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-10-12 17:22:54 | Re: optimizer question |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-10-12 17:14:38 | Re: optimizer question |