Re: strict aliasing (was: const correctness)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
Cc: "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Thomas Munro" <munro(at)ip9(dot)org>, "Florian Pflug" <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: strict aliasing (was: const correctness)
Date: 2011-11-14 21:22:52
Message-ID: 27248.1321305772@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> writes:
>> Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> Dunno ... where were the warnings exactly?

> From HEAD checkout of a few minutes ago I now see only 9:

Hmm ... well, none of those look likely to be in performance-sensitive
areas. But I wonder just how good the trouble-detection code is these
days.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2011-11-14 21:25:19 Re: strict aliasing (was: const correctness)
Previous Message Thom Brown 2011-11-14 21:10:20 Re: patch: CHECK FUNCTION statement