Re: windows doesn't notice backend death

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: windows doesn't notice backend death
Date: 2009-05-04 12:37:06
Message-ID: 27239.1241440626@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Another thought that came to mind: we could set up an atexit hook that

> This sounds like a good idea in general - because it will avoid having
> to restart on unix.

> It'd still have to be combined with the dead-man-switch idea to defend
> completely. But it could be worthwhile doing anyway, for other platforms.

Right, exactly. I'll try to produce a patch today.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2009-05-04 12:37:53 Re: windows shared memory error
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2009-05-04 12:24:09 Re: Documentation: GiST extension implementation