Re: Table partitioning

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Gravsjö <robert(at)blogg(dot)se>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Table partitioning
Date: 2009-05-20 13:47:10
Message-ID: 27234.1242827230@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Robert_Gravsj=F6?= <robert(at)blogg(dot)se> writes:
> Is there a reason to avoid populating the master table other that the
> cost of the data always being included when querying?

You can do it if you want ... I think most people think it complicates
data management, but there's nothing in the system design that prevents
it.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andy Colson 2009-05-20 13:54:08 Re: [Windows] Feedback on PG?
Previous Message Sam Mason 2009-05-20 13:21:26 Re: Can I pause the pg_dump or pg_restore