Re: SGML cleanup

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: SGML cleanup
Date: 2004-08-24 02:53:21
Message-ID: 27191.1093316001@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> writes:
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> Why are we mentioning Oracle behavior at all?

> I don't have a strong opinion on this -- is there a consensus we don't
> want to do it?

I think the existing mention is fine. It's silly to pretend that these
decisions are not motivated by Oracle compatibility, especially when we
are deliberately deviating from the spec syntax.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Shinji Teragaito 2004-08-24 04:13:43 HP-UX PA-RISC/Itanium 64-bit Patch and HP-UX 11.23 Patch
Previous Message Max Dunn 2004-08-24 02:17:06 Re: Service startup delay