| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Ross J(dot) Reedstrom" <reedstrm(at)rice(dot)edu> |
| Cc: | Ulrich Neumann <U_Neumann(at)gne(dot)de>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Antw: Re: Patch for NetWare support |
| Date: | 2002-08-13 16:54:22 |
| Message-ID: | 27187.1029257662@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
"Ross J. Reedstrom" <reedstrm(at)rice(dot)edu> writes:
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 12:16:35AM +0200, Ulrich Neumann wrote:
>> At the moment there isn't ln at all. Just making a copy of the binary
>> is a problem because the binary name is compiled in the binary
>> and if you use srgc[0] NetWare reports "postgres" instead of
>> "postmaster".
> O.K., that just means that instead of 'cp' it'll nead an ugly hack to the
> Makefiles that links a seperate executable with the second name. That's
> better than an ugly hack in the mainline executable code, I suppose.
Should we even do that? What is srgc[0], and why should we care whether
it can tell the difference between postgres and postmaster?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ross J. Reedstrom | 2002-08-13 17:22:43 | Re: Antw: Re: Patch for NetWare support |
| Previous Message | Ross J. Reedstrom | 2002-08-13 16:12:59 | Re: Antw: Re: Patch for NetWare support |