Re: Two features left

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Jean-Luc Lachance <jllachan(at)nsd(dot)ca>, Jon Swinth <jswinth(at)atomicpc(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Two features left
Date: 2002-11-27 20:42:24
Message-ID: 27185.1038429744@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Right. I hadn't planned on ABORT ALL, but it could be done to abort the
> entire transaction. Is there any standard on that?

I would be inclined to argue against any such thing; if I'm trying to
confine the effects of an error by doing a subtransaction BEGIN, I don't
think I *want* to allow something inside the subtransaction to abort my
outer transaction ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-11-27 20:44:24 Re: Two features left
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-11-27 20:25:16 Re: Two features left