Re: FailedAssertion("pd_idx == pinfo->nparts", File: "execPartition.c", Line: 1689)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andy Fan <zhihui(dot)fan1213(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: FailedAssertion("pd_idx == pinfo->nparts", File: "execPartition.c", Line: 1689)
Date: 2020-08-07 02:44:30
Message-ID: 2715413.1596768270@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andy Fan <zhihui(dot)fan1213(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I am not sure if we need to limit the scope to "between parsing and
> execution",

Yeah, there might be reason to add similar functionality in other
places later. I'm not sure where yet --- but that idea does make
me slightly unhappy with the "delay_execution" moniker. I don't
have a better name though ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Noah Misch 2020-08-07 03:00:20 Re: public schema default ACL
Previous Message Masahiko Sawada 2020-08-07 02:40:23 Re: display offset along with block number in vacuum errors