Re: libpq compression

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Euler Taveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: libpq compression
Date: 2012-06-20 15:49:51
Message-ID: 27148.1340207391@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> I looked at the code (apps/ciphers.c) and it looks pretty easy to obtain
> the list of ciphers starting from the stringified configuration
> parameter and iterate on them.

Do you mean that it will produce an expansion of the set of ciphers
meeting criteria like "!aNULL"? If so, I think we are set; we can
easily check to see if the active cipher is in that list, no?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2012-06-20 15:50:18 Re: [PATCH 10/16] Introduce the concept that wal has a 'origin' node
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2012-06-20 15:48:21 Re: Nasty, propagating POLA violation in COPY CSV HEADER