From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "Patches (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Missing array support |
Date: | 2003-06-30 02:58:59 |
Message-ID: | 27137.1056941939@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> writes:
> So I'd propose that we put another check in inline_function(), and
> reject attempts to inline functions with polymorphic arguments.
Seems reasonable. Someday we might want to try to make that work,
but not the day before feature freeze...
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-06-30 03:39:40 | Re: [HACKERS] PlPython |
Previous Message | Joe Conway | 2003-06-30 02:56:16 | Re: [HACKERS] Missing array support |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Srikanth M | 2003-06-30 04:16:31 | Urgent : Regarding Code Submission |
Previous Message | Joe Conway | 2003-06-30 02:56:16 | Re: [HACKERS] Missing array support |