| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Marko Tiikkaja <marko(dot)tiikkaja(at)cs(dot)helsinki(dot)fi>, Steve Singer <ssinger_pg(at)sympatico(dot)ca>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Review: Fix snapshot taking inconsistencies |
| Date: | 2011-02-28 18:45:04 |
| Message-ID: | 27126.1298918704@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> So: exactly what is the intended behavioral change as of now, and what
>> is the argument supporting that change?
> IIUC, this is the result of countless rounds of communal bikeshedding around:
Quite :-(. But I'm not sure where the merry-go-round stopped.
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-07/msg01256.php
Please notice that the very terms of discussion in that message depend
on a view of wCTEs that has got nothing to do with what was applied.
I'm afraid that the goals of this patch might be similarly obsolete.
I definitely don't want to apply the patch in a hurry just because
we're down to the end of the commitfest.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2011-02-28 18:49:07 | Re: mysql2pgsql.perl update |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2011-02-28 18:44:08 | Re: WIP: cross column correlation ... |