From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | David Hartwig <daveh(at)insightdist(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] OR clause status |
Date: | 1998-08-05 14:45:17 |
Message-ID: | 2711.902328317@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
David Hartwig <daveh(at)insightdist(dot)com> writes:
> Ran a few tests last night. So far, works great for single, non-internal,
> attributes. However, I was not able to get the query to use the table's oid
> index when such an index existed.
Perhaps this is an artifact of the type-coercion issue (see "indexes and
floats" thread on pg-hackers). I find I have to write something like
WHERE oid = 123456::oid
to get the system to use an index on OID. If I write
WHERE oid = 123456
it takes it, but does it by sequential scan :-(
I do not know if it's acted like that all along or it's a result
of Tom's type coercion fixes of a couple months ago.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 1998-08-05 14:52:39 | Re: [HACKERS] indexes and floats |
Previous Message | Sergey E. Levov | 1998-08-05 14:22:22 | SPI procedure for removing large objects |