From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | David Blewett <david(at)dawninglight(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Bad Plan for Questionnaire-Type Query |
Date: | 2009-05-24 18:42:02 |
Message-ID: | 27080.1243190522@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
David Blewett <david(at)dawninglight(dot)net> writes:
> I took the time to load this data into an 8.4beta2 install, and the same
> query runs in a much more reasonable timeframe (~3s as opposed to ~50s). I
> set the statistics target to 500, and got this explain [1].
> 1. http://explain.depesz.com/s/pw
Hmm... the join size estimates are no better than before, so I'm afraid
that 8.4 is just as vulnerable to picking a bad plan as the previous
versions were. I don't think you should assume anything's been fixed.
It still feels like this schema design is obscuring correlations that
the planner needs to know about in order to make decent estimates.
You mentioned earlier that the seemingly unrelated question_ids were
linked via a common submission_id. I wonder whether it's possible to
query using the submission_id instead?
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Łukasz Jagiełło | 2009-05-24 19:46:38 | Problems with autovacuum |
Previous Message | Frank Joerdens | 2009-05-23 00:13:08 | Re: Full statement logging problematic on larger machines? |