Re: Planner debug views

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Qingqing Zhou <zhouqq(dot)postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Planner debug views
Date: 2015-07-28 20:01:51
Message-ID: 27070.1438113711@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> Qingqing Zhou wrote:
>> The file name is not random, it is fixed so we can create foreign table
>> once and use it afterwards - I actually want to push them into
>> system_views.sql.

> Got that. That seems fragile and not very convenient; I don't think
> forcing retries until no concurrent writers were using the same file is
> convenient at all. When you need this facility the most, which is
> during slow planner runs, it is more likely that somebody else will
> overwrite your file.

FWIW, I would be very much against anything that requires going through
the filesystem for this. That will create security/privilege issues that
we should not want to introduce, quite aside from the usability problems
Alvaro points out.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2015-07-28 20:07:46 Re: Re: Removing SSL renegotiation (Was: Should we back-patch SSL renegotiation fixes?)
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2015-07-28 20:01:30 Re: Remaining 'needs review' patchs in July commitfest