From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Troels Arvin <troels(at)arvin(dot)dk> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Marc Fournier <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Some download statistics |
Date: | 2005-02-24 20:29:20 |
Message-ID: | 27068.1109276960@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-www |
Troels Arvin <troels(at)arvin(dot)dk> writes:
> On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 17:35:57 +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> Frankly, I'd suggest dropping the splits. Thoughts?
> I also found the split sources + a non-split sources version to be
> confusing. As you, I think that splitting should be dropped.
Perhaps the confusion issue could be addressed by keeping the split
sources in a separate subdirectory:
pub/source/v.8.0.1/
postgresql-8.0.1.tar.bz2
postgresql-8.0.1.tar.bz2.md5
postgresql-8.0.1.tar.gz
postgresql-8.0.1.tar.gz.md5
split-tarballs/
postgresql-base-8.0.1.tar.bz2
postgresql-base-8.0.1.tar.bz2.md5
etc...
I suspect the demand for the split tarballs is mighty low nowaways,
but it's probably not zero yet.
Also: I notice that the README file that's supposed to tell people about
the split-tarball scheme is not present in any of the recent-version
subdirectories, so it's no wonder that they are confused.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2005-02-24 20:43:04 | Re: Some download statistics |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-02-24 20:13:15 | Where are we on stored procedures? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2005-02-24 20:43:04 | Re: Some download statistics |
Previous Message | Troels Arvin | 2005-02-24 20:11:54 | Re: Some download statistics |