| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | clime7(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #9749: ERROR: unexpected classid 3600 |
| Date: | 2014-04-16 15:48:13 |
| Message-ID: | 27063.1397663293@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> Oops, I just noticed that the fix is very simple in HEAD and 9.3 because
> we can just add the appropriate case labels to the already existing
> generic object alter-owner case. But in 9.2, we not only need to add
> extra cases to cover each object, but we also need to refactor
> the appropriate AlterOwner routine to work on OID input rather than name
> only. In other words we need the equivalent of
> 0c7b9dc7d037c4465227dc2300ff48019feeba37 for each of the text search
> object types :-(
> Not sure I have the time to do all that right now. Contributions
> welcome.
Given the lack of complaints to date, maybe fixing it in 9.3/HEAD is
sufficient. I'd certainly rather see those branches get fixed now,
and 9.2 later, than nothing happen at all for a long time. It's also
arguable that back-patching such a large change into 9.2 is more risk
than the problem is worth.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2014-04-16 16:28:09 | Re: BUG #9749: ERROR: unexpected classid 3600 |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2014-04-16 15:29:01 | Re: BUG #9749: ERROR: unexpected classid 3600 |