Re: Load problems...

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Daniel Andersen <zedar(at)free2air(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: "C(dot) Bensend" <benny(at)bennyvision(dot)com>, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Load problems...
Date: 2001-12-19 05:48:23
Message-ID: 27036.1008740903@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

Daniel Andersen <zedar(at)free2air(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> [4059] DEBUG: connection startup failed (fork failure): Resource
> temporarily unavailable
> [4059] DEBUG: could not launch checkpoint process (fork failure): Resource
> temporarily unavailable

Hmm ... a fork failure suggests resource exhaustion somewhere in the
kernel. Do you have enough swap space? A large enough NFILE (kernel
filetable size) setting?

> there are generally up to 200 copies of postmaster running at any given time,

200 * a few dozen open files per backend is a lot of open files. I'm
betting on NFILE being the issue, myself.

Linuxen tend to lie through their teeth about the number of open files
they can support per-process (sysconf(_SC_OPEN_MAX)). In 7.2 you can
compensate for that by setting PG's config variable
max_files_per_process to something sane, maybe 50 to 100.

You'll still need to make sure that the kernel is configured to support
max_files_per_process * max_connections open files, but at least that's
a definable number now.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephan Szabo 2001-12-19 06:02:43 Re: Load problems...
Previous Message Daniel Andersen 2001-12-19 05:10:08 Re: Load problems...