Re: x = NULL

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: x = NULL
Date: 2001-09-19 04:14:34
Message-ID: 27024.1000872874@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> I'm getting tired of this, so unless someone can present a reason not to,
> I'll implement a GUC parameter to turn this off -- and turn it off by
> default.

You'll have to push the switch-driven transformation into analyze.c ---
it is not okay for gram.y to look at GUC parameters. But as long as you
do it correctly, I'm for it.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-09-19 05:07:57 Re: Beta time
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2001-09-19 03:07:32 Re: Beta time